[Harmony-Drafting] Porting Harmony

[Andrew Rens]

Hi Walter

You may have noticed that after porting the Creative Commons licenses to
many jurisdictions that Creative Commons is now trying to create a single
unified license that will be so effective in all jurisdictions that the
need for porting is eliminated.

I've ported a CC license and I believe that there are a number of arguments
in favour of doing so.
But there are also arguments in favour of developing a 2.0 set of licenses
that will be so effective in all jurisdictions that the need for porting is
eliminated.

I am interested in what everyone on the list has to say about the specific
shortcomings of the current licenses in different jurisdictions, since that
would enable a better analysis of whether porting, or addressing those
issues in 2.0 would be better.

Are there specific European/Netherlands issues that you've identified? Or
would it be easier to identify the issues through the exercise of porting?

best

Andrew Rens



On 11 January 2012 17:25, Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst at xs4all.nl>wrote:

> L.S.,
>
> Are there any objections for starting to port the agreements to different
> legal systems?
>
> Regards,
>
>  Walter
> ______________________________**_________________
> Harmony-Drafting mailing list
> Harmony-Drafting at lists.**harmonyagreements.org<Harmony-Drafting at lists.harmonyagreements.org>
> http://lists.**harmonyagreements.org/mailman/**listinfo/harmony-drafting<http://lists.harmonyagreements.org/mailman/listinfo/harmony-drafting>
>



-- 
Andrew Rens

ex africa semper aliquid novi (http://aliquidnovi.org)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.harmonyagreements.org/pipermail/harmony-drafting/attachments/20120111/1727afc2/attachment.html>