[Harmony-Drafting] Harmony DCO
allison at lohutok.net
Thu Sep 29 09:38:18 UTC 2011
On 08/06/2011 05:55 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> I think it should be identical, unless there's an extremely good reason
> why not. The whole point of Harmony is supposed to be preventing
> proliferation ... rewriting the DCO "just because" is inviting it.
I've also been polling people at various conferences, and the general
consensus seems to be to include the DCO "as is" in the Harmony
templates and agreement generator tool, and to add a guide page that
helps projects figure out how to adopt it.
Any objections to this approach?
More information about the Harmony-Drafting