[Harmony-Drafting] Licensing for website content and agreements

[consiliens]

When will the website and agreements be updated to reflect the chosen 
license?

Is there a reason why CC BY won out over CC0?  I think either is fine, 
however I know some have raised concerns about CC BY on the old list and 
on identi.ca.

If CC BY is selected, the footer should contain the full name of the 
license including jurisdiction.

"under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License"

On 05/18/2011 03:19 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
> In the call we discussed the need to make a difference between general
> modifications and expected variations (picking options and substituting
> the variables for project name, submission instructions, and
> instructions for what to do when you aren't the copyright owner). Here's
> a suggested revision:
>
> On 05/17/2011 12:06 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
>> Website footer:
>>
>> Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a
>> Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.
>>
>> Policy page:
>>
>> Except where otherwise noted, all content on this site is licensed under
>> a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Everyone is permitted to
>> copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Harmony contributor
>> agreements. Modified versions of the agreements, however, should not be
>> called "Harmony" agreements.
>
> Except where otherwise noted, all content on this site is licensed under
> a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Everyone is permitted to
> copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Harmony contributor
> agreements, including the standard option selections and requested
> information about the project. Versions of the agreements that have been
> modified in any other way, however, should not be called "Harmony"
> agreements.
>
> Allison
> _______________________________________________
> Harmony-Drafting mailing list
> Harmony-Drafting at lists.harmonyagreements.org
> http://lists.harmonyagreements.org/mailman/listinfo/harmony-drafting
>